Auditory, Visual and Postural Reaction Time Among Middle Aged
Type 2 Diabetics and Healthy Individuals – A Cross-Sectional Study

Mishra, Siddharth S; Dhotre, Vibha

doi:10.18502/ijdo.v13i1.5744

Volume 13, Issue 1 (volume 13, number 1 2021) IJDO 2021, 13(1): 1-9 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.18502/ijdo.v13i1.5744

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mishra S S, Dhotre V. Auditory, Visual and Postural Reaction Time Among Middle Aged Type 2 Diabetics and Healthy Individuals – A Cross-Sectional Study. IJDO 2021; 13 (1) :1-9
URL: http://ijdo.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-605-en.html

Auditory, Visual and Postural Reaction Time Among Middle Aged Type 2 Diabetics and Healthy Individuals – A Cross-Sectional Study

Siddharth S Mishra ^*

, Vibha Dhotre

Assistant Professor, MGM College of Physiotherapy and Hospital. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS) Nasik, India

Abstract: (1460 Views)

Objective: Study aims to compare Auditory, Visual and Postural RT among middle aged type 2 diabetics and healthy individuals.
Materials and Methods: A Cross-Sectional Study which included 200 Participants that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, were divided into 2 groups. Diabetic group included 100 participants who were clinically diagnosed with type 2 Diabetes and healthy group insldued 100 healthy participants. Both the groups performed Auditory Reaction Time test (ART) and Visual reaction time test (VRT) using Inquisit 4.0 computer software, Ruler drop test (RDT), Wobble Board (WB) Test and Timed up and go test (TUGT) was performed.
Results: Statistical analysis (independent sample T-test) revealed a significant delay in VRT (P-value= 0.001), ART (P-value= 0.001), Wobble Board Test (P-value= 0.001) and TUGT (P-value= 0.001) among diabetic group compared to healthy group. There is no significant difference in Ruler drop test (P-value= 0.919) among both the groups.
Conclusion: There was is a significant delay in RT among middle aged type 2 diabetic participants when compared to healthy participants. This is associated with reduced sensory stimuli from various systems and resulting in late response in diabetic group

Keywords: Middle aged, Reaction time, Postural balance, Healthy volunteers, Gait

Full-Text [PDF 425 kb] (596 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/03/13 | Accepted: 2021/03/20 | Published: 2021/03/20

References

1. Mittu S, Sidhu J. Comparative study of reaction times in type 2 diabetics and non-diabetes. Australasian Medical Journal. 2013;6(4).

2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, Eighth Edition. International Diabetes Federation; 2017. www.diabetesatlas.org. Accessed January 16, 2018.

3. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM. Examination of static and dynamic postural stability in individuals with functionally stable and unstable ankles. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2004;14(6):332-8. [DOI:10.1097/00042752-200411000-00002]

4. Irrgang JJ, Whitney SL, Cox ED. Balance and proprioceptive training for rehabilitation of the lower extremity. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1994;3(1):68-83. [DOI:10.1123/jsr.3.1.68]

5. Guskiewicz KM, Perrin DH. Research and clinical applications of assessing balance. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1996;5(1):45-63. [DOI:10.1123/jsr.5.1.45]

6. Xipeng L, Ruiyu L, Meng L, Yanzhuo Z, Kaosan G, Liping W. Effects of diabetes on hearing and cochlear structures. Journal of Otology. 2013;8(2):82-7. [DOI:10.1016/S1672-2930(13)50017-1]

7. Mohan M, Thombre DP, Das AK, Subramanian N, Chandrasekar S. Reaction time in clinical diabetes mellitus. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 1984;28(4):311-4.

8. Xu H, Curtis T, Stitt A. Pathophysiology and Pathogenesis of Diabetic Retinopathy. Amsterdam: Diapedia, The Living Textbook of Diabetes. 2014. [DOI:10.14496/dia.7104343513.14]

9. Pardianto G. Understanding diabetic retinopathy. Mimbar Ilmiah Oftalmologi Indonesia. 2005;2:65-71.

10. Richerson SJ, Robinson CJ, Shum J. A comparative study of reaction times between type II diabetics and non-diabetics. Biomedical engineering online. 2005;4(1):1-8. [DOI:10.1186/1475-925X-4-12]

11. Giard MH, Peronnet F. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 1999;11(5):473-90. [DOI:10.1162/089892999563544]

12. Sartucci F, Piaggesi A, Logi F, Bonfiglio L, Bongioanni P, Pellegrinetti A, et al. Impaired ascendant central pathways conduction in impotent diabetic subjects. Acta neurologica scandinavica. 1999;99(6):381-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1999.tb07368.x]

13. Ryan CM, Geckle MO. Circumscribed cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care. 2000;23(10):1486-93. [DOI:10.2337/diacare.23.10.1486]

14. Ceriello A. Oxidative stress and glycemic regulation. Metabolism. 2000;49(2):27-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0026-0495(00)80082-7]

15. Kaur P, Paul M, Sandhu JS. Auditory and visual reaction time in athletes, healthy controls, and patients of type 1 diabetes mellitus: A comparative study. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2006;26(3):112-5. [DOI:10.4103/0973-3930.32170]

16. Pain MT, Hibbs A. Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time. Journal of sports sciences. 2007;25(1):79-8. [DOI:10.1080/02640410600718004]

17. Kemp BJ. Reaction time of young and elderly subjects in relation to perceptual deprivation and signal-on versus signal-off conditions. Developmental Psychology. 1973;8(2):268. [DOI:10.1037/h0034147]

18. Dobrzanski T, Rychta T. Studies on the time of simple reaction and selective reaction in diabetes and in schizophrenia. Polish medical journal. 1968;7(2):442-8.

19. Parekh N, Gajbhiye IP, Wahane M, Titus J. The study of auditory and visual reaction time in healthy controls, patients of diabetes mellitus on modern allopathic treatment, and those performing aerobic exercises. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2004;5(3):149-56.

20. Bhat S, Kumar S. Comparison of Reaction Time in Older Versus Middle-aged Type II Diabetic Patients-An observational Study. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. 2013;7(1):250. [DOI:10.5958/j.0973-5674.7.3.111]

21. Fahmy IM, Ramzy GM, Salem NA, Ahmed GM, Mohammed AA. Balance disturbance in patients with diabetic sensory polyneuropathy. Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2014;51(1):21-9.

22. Gu Y, Dennis SM. Are falls prevention programs effective at reducing the risk factors for falls in people with type-2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2017;31(2):504-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.10.004]

23. Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Barzintaj F, Salimifard MR. Comparison the effects of two types of therapeutic exercises Frenkele vs. Swiss ball on the clinical balance measures in patients with type II diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2017;11:S29-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2016.08.020]

24. El-Kader SM. Impact of Ankle Joint Mobility on Balance Performance in Elderly Type 2 Diabetic Subjects. MOJ Gerontol Ger. 2018;3(2):00082. [DOI:10.15406/mojgg.2018.03.00082]

25. Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Strotmeyer ES, Kuller LH, Broudeau R, Kammerer C, et al. Accelerated loss of skeletal muscle strength in older adults with type 2 diabetes: the health, aging, and body composition study. Diabetes care. 2007;30(6):1507-12. [DOI:10.2337/dc06-2537]

26. Alvarenga PP, Pereira DS, Anjos DM. Functional mobility and executive function in elderly diabetics and non-diabetics. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(6):491-6. [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552010000600007]

27. Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE, Nichaman MZ, Gibbons LW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, et al. Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. Jama. 1999;282(16):1547-53. [DOI:10.1001/jama.282.16.1547]

28. Denton M, Prus S, Walters V. Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Social science & medicine. 2004;58(12):2585-600. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008]