References: All manuscripts should be accompanied by relevant references. The author should ensure reference to locally published studies by doing proper literature search. It may not be possible for the editor and reviewers to check the accuracy of all reference citations. To minimize such errors author should verify references against the original documents. The Reference should provide the following information as stated in the presented models as follows: Article: Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, et al. Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetologia 2009; 52(1):17-30. Chapter in book: Buse JB, Polonsky KS, Burant CF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, editors. Williams textbook of endocrinology.11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008: 1329-1390. Book: Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR. Williams textbook of endocrinology.11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008: 1231. Electronic: Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious disease. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 1995 Jan-Mar [cited 1999 Dec 25]; 1(1): [24 screens]. Available from: URL: http://www/cdc/gov/ncidoc/EID/eid.htm.
Accountability for the Peer reviewers
i. Submitted articles must be kept confidential and the peer reviewers must not fraud the data of the articles and at the time of publication, they cannot be used in any way.
ii. Evaluations should be conducted objectively and without personal criticism of the author, and the authors' recognition should not influence the opinions and decisions of the referees.
iii. The reviewers must express their opinions with supporting arguments in a maximum of 1000 words.
iv. The reviewers may be aware of the existence of a published paper that has not been cited by the authors. In such a situation, the reviewers should discuss any fundamental similarities and overlaps between the version under review and any other published article with the editor of the journal.
v. Manuscripts containing various reasons, such as competition, partnership, or another connections with any of the researchers and institutions involved in the conflict of interest articles, should not be assessed by the reviewers.
|